Transparency
Network statistics.
A full breakdown of what this network has enforced — accounts banned and communities flagged — in which categories, and how often it has reversed itself. Published openly because a shared ban list that can't be audited is just a rumour with a database behind it.
Accounts
0
Cases on record
0
Currently banned
0
Bans reversed
0
Under appeal
0
Servers protected
0
Cases opened, last 30 days
No prior period to compare against yet
0%
Of all cases have been reversed
We publish this because getting it wrong is possible
—
Of decided appeals were upheld
No appeals decided yet
0
Active bans that are permanent
The rest expire on their own
Communities
0
Communities on record
0
Currently flagged
0
Cleared after review
0
Where members were banned
0
Accounts banned that way
0%
Of listings have been cleared
Published for the same reason as the ban reversal rate
0%
Of listings led to a whole-server ban
Membership alone is usually not a ban — this is the exception
0%
Of all cases came from a server sweep
Each one is still an individual, appealable case
0
Categories in use for communities
Different from ban categories — a server can't be a "hacked account"
By category
What people are banned for
No cases on record yet — this fills in as the network is used.
Over time
Cases opened, last 30 days
20 Sep
Hover any bar for the exact day
Today
Methodology
How to read this page
What's counted
Every case, including reversed ones
- Cases on record is every case ever opened. Unbanning changes a case's status, it never removes it — so this number only goes up.
- Currently banned counts cases in the active state right now, which is the figure that actually reflects who is being kept out today.
- A mass ban creates one case per account, so twenty alts show as twenty cases — not one. The same is true of a whole-server ban: it appears here as however many people it banned, not as one action.
- Communities are counted separately from accounts. Flagging a server is not a ban and adds nothing to the account figures; only an actual sweep does.
What isn't here
Nothing that identifies anyone
- No user IDs, usernames, reasons or evidence. Those live on the public lookup, one ID at a time, deliberately.
- No server names, and no per-server figures — a breakdown by community would just be a scoreboard.
- Never who reported someone. Not in aggregate, not anywhere.
Caveats
What these numbers aren't
- They measure our moderation decisions — not how much of anything is happening on Discord.
- A low count in a category can mean it's rare, or that we're not the ones catching it.
- Figures are computed live at page load, so two people loading it seconds apart can see different totals.
- The community figures cover servers we reviewed. There is no way to know what share of bad servers that is, and we don't imply one.
Think a number here is wrong, or want a breakdown that isn't published? safety@mrbridy.net.